Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Christie MacFadyen's avatar

First thoughts… having participated in party union and government lobbying I’ve taken on the concept of form and function. It’s very difficult to change a thing if it’s built to do something else. Nonetheless infiltration on the party level seems crucial but these institutions can be practically eradicated and yet still rise from the fires and still be worse. Of course we must do it and vote as we wipe our feet and drink water. And in our everyday lives and especially work we can choose to do things that change systems. Community connections and meaningful work that contributes. We don’t need to do the ‘bullshit jobs’ if we don’t want to. And we need to take way more pride in essential work and pay respect to those who keep our daily lives together with their trade skills and their care for others and the food they grow and all that stuff that has been made to be less worthy.

Expand full comment
Wallace Oyama's avatar

Having just recently voted in a city of Vancouver election in which I was to select one mayor out of 15 candidates, 10 councilors from 59 candidates, 9 school board members out of 31, and 7 out of 32 for the park board, choosing poorly is easy when the ballots are made this complicated. But there can also be merit in simple choices, especially if they can be framed in a way that as many people as possible can understand, appreciate, and make a decision (this would also help with the knowledge problem mentioned in your first substack post a few weeks ago). Rather than try to tackle a bunch of problems at the same time, maybe we should first focus on ones that will be the most productive towards getting the democratic participation and cooperation you write about here. A good place to start is addressing, as you mentioned, addressing the toxic environment that makes it difficult to have a civil, productive, and informed exchange of ideas.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts